기도를 했다. 교회를 위해서 그리고 나를 위해서...
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3500007/
-Current research indicates that care processes...are perhaps better measures of the overall quality of care for the injured child.
-Survival...may no longer be a sufficient indicator of quality care... mortality is relatively low in injured children (about 4% in the recent literature)
-half of all U.S. emergency departments see fewer than 10 pediatric patients per day
-Surgeons experienced in pediatric trauma...development of non-operative management of solid organ injuries
-unnecessary laparotomies.
-large variations in splenectomy rates across the country, unexplained by severity of injury
-Developing and maintaining a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU)...the closed-ICU model
-(I can do referred?) Whereas organized trauma systems clearly reduce deaths in adults, similar evidence to support regional pediatric trauma care remains limited.[16,17] Seminal work by Pollack and others provided the initial evidence that critically ill and injured children treated in tertiary care facilities had a reduced risk of death compared to nontertiary care centers
-trauma designation and pediatric expertise
-Despite this regionalization effort, most injured children in the US are not treated at specialized pediatric centers.[18,22] Segui-Gomez and colleagues reported that 77% of injured children receive care at centers without pediatric designation
-(Is this necessary?)improved coordination among acute care facilities
-Although specific data about inclusive pediatric trauma systems are currently lacking,
No comments:
Post a Comment